Sleeved 426 or 440 discussion

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Fast56k, Feb 18, 2008.

  1. Fast56k

    Fast56k New Member

    Messages:
    271
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Thanks to you and HOP for all of your feedback today.

    C.
     
  2. PPPAndy

    PPPAndy New Member

    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Well lets see here. The Ford 347 (most popular ford stroker) has a rod-ratio of 1.58. Ours is a 1.51, the chevy 383 (most popular chevy stroker) is a 1.52 and even the stock 454 has a 1.53 ratio. The consensus amongst engine manufacturers is that a ratio of 1.50" is the lowest acceptable rod ratio for a street motor. Realistically, rod ratios between 1.65" - 1.80" are ideal. Obviously a stroker motor will have more wear and tear on the rings than something with a more favorable rod-ratio, but depending on the engine builder, I would say that the 426 is no worse than the stock motor and might even outlive a stock motor. I am speaking from experience with a 426 that has over 30,000 miles on it. So a 426 with a smaller stroke and bigger bore will outlast the big stroke/smaller bore, but at what expense does that come. Sleeves almost double the cost of the shortblock, why not buy 2 of the standard 426's, that will surely outlast 1 426 with a more ideal rod/ratio. Im not arguing what is good and what is bad as far as rod/ratios go, but in the 6.1 block, its much more economical to do a 4.06/6.125 426 instead of a sleeved 426 IMO.
    http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2003/09/stroker/index2.php
     
  3. Hemidup

    Hemidup Supporting Vendor

    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Sleeving takes away from the integrity of a block and your only asking for future problems.