No doubt it's a great idea in theory, but it appears the execution could be handled a bit better. Regardless, it's not my test. On with the results!
You missed this part: My Jeep made even more power with 30+ degrees (per my request) than it did with the intial 28-29.
Read post #136. :please: I don't drop names, I reference them when called upon. It's a simple fact that Diablo based their canned tunes...
You're right, my bad. I wasn't reading WOT. Still 24.5 is higher than 24.
Did I say across the board? I said a max of 30-31 degrees--no mine doesn't run that high across the board it drops as low as 26 degrees in the...
100 octane would be precautionary, 110 is leaded overkill.
Nothing really. Let another tuner have a crack and then you'll have some viable data to compare. 110 octane is wholly unecessary on a 10.3:1...
Stockers have 24 degrees, what else needs to be said.
I tested 14 B&G CMR tunes (trying to figure out the 2wd issue) in December alone. Timing was at 30-31 degrees for all of them (93 oct.) and the...
+1
Are we talking a 2" chevy journal?
Planning on forced induction?
Absolutely, running 104 or even 100 octane with stock compression is going to hurt power period.
What's the static C/R of your 392? Again this is not a knock, but running 11.97 (which some stockers have eclipsed) isn't proving much.
You can't be serious? I have 30 degrees in my N/A stock longblock 93 octane tune from B&G as does everyone else with a Dave Kasper N/A tune....
Not so much, but it's your test.
Gotcha, more static C/R should get you over 500rw SAE for sure. I realize that the stock intake manifold was never designed to feed that many...
Ported Stock TB: http://www.srtconnection.com/forums/showthread.php?t=948 Will require an accelerator recal ($40ish at your dealer or free...
Separate names with a comma.
