Before/After Heads-Cam dyno results

Discussion in 'Power Ported Performance' started by PPPAndy, Dec 10, 2008.

  1. PPPAndy

    PPPAndy New Member

    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    SRT8 Bone Stock on the Before Pull

    What was added to the after pull:
    Longtube Headers
    Catback Exhaust
    CAI
    Diablosport Predator
    Tuned by AJ-Hemituner
    Underdrive pulley
    PPP Stage 2 Heads
    PPP Forged Pushrods
    PPP Pro-Series Track Warrior

    You will see numerous heads/cams out there that will make more peak hp than this, but what good does it do you to have a ton of peak power and no bottom-end/mid-range. I think this graph illustrates best that you can pickup hp/tq across the board with a good set of heads and a well engineered camshaft. Not only will this setup dominate at the track, but with an average increase in tq of 62ft lbs, this car is flat-booking on the street.
     
  2. vinnysrt8

    vinnysrt8 Full Access Member

    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    wow that is some inprovment i think that the same setup keoni has
     
  3. Frozen

    Frozen No innocence in glory...

    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Location:
    Long Island - NY
    nice gains! but i think you put the wrong dyno sheet up as that one doesn't go above 450....
     
  4. PPPAndy

    PPPAndy New Member

    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    never claimed over 450rwhp. Not sure what you mean.
     
  5. Frozen

    Frozen No innocence in glory...

    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Location:
    Long Island - NY
    Engine Output 512hp/496tq


    maybe I'm just very confused.
     
  6. Bone

    Bone Love maker, heart breaker

    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Location:
    W.R., GA
    423 HP stock, to the wheels? 0% drivetrain loss? Isn't 425 crank HP on a 6.1?
     
  7. budoboy

    budoboy Full Access Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    I think it is confusing to most folks (me included) when you advertise estimated crank horsepower along with rwhp. Crank horsepower numbers sound impressive but are a guess based on an estimate (chassis dynos aren't absolute). The differences between runs is probably the most important things (if all conditions are the same at the dyno)
     
  8. LegMaker

    LegMaker LMI - LegMakerIntakes

    Messages:
    10,483
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Location:
    orlando
    guys, the last number listed on the charts are simply crank hp ratings...... the numbers in the rpm ranges on the chart are actual rear wheel numbers......

    nice set up andy and seems to be a very streetable set up with lots of USEABLE power for street driven cars!
     
  9. PPPAndy

    PPPAndy New Member

    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Our engine output numbers are not a guess. The 1st 426 we ever dynoed made 560hp on the engine dyno and 463rwhp in the car. Thats a loss of 17.5%. Using that number, our stock baseline comes up with 423hp which is almost exactly what the car is rated at. The peak numbers are not what we are trying to showcase, we are simply showing the delta between stock and heads/cam. I posted in both rwhp and bhp because so many shops claim gains in bhp and others claim rwhp, we show you both.
     
  10. Inferal

    Inferal Full Access Member

    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    One hell of a gain from beginning to end
     
  11. sdcarguy

    sdcarguy A bit off

    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Location:
    San Diego
    Also IMHO its confusing to say heads/cam gains when you list all the other parts that were added at the same time ;)
     
  12. PPPAndy

    PPPAndy New Member

    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007

    There isnt enough room in the title to say Heads/cam/headers/catback/cai/predator/tune before/after dyno results. But at least in the thread I was noted everything that was added. I could also show you a graph where longtubes gained 7hp and cai was 5hp and a catback was 3, so I dont think they were doing a whole lot in this dyno sheet.
     
  13. 8yourM5

    8yourM5 Full Access Member

    Messages:
    2,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    really 7 hp from the longtubes thats it? hmmm. I thought with heads and cam they would help alot more. non the less great numers through out the rpm range andy nice job
     
  14. Inferal

    Inferal Full Access Member

    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Man Rough Crowd
     
  15. budoboy

    budoboy Full Access Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    I was thinking the same thing. Hemisfear warned me that they weren't much bang for the buck but I got them anyways.
     
  16. Inferal

    Inferal Full Access Member

    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    The stock SRT Headers are real hard to improve on