Dyno Testing CAI's.

Discussion in 'Power Ported Performance' started by PPPAndy, Oct 15, 2008.

  1. PPPAndy

    PPPAndy New Member

    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Car: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8
    200 miles on odometer
    no mods


    1. Stock CAI, 91 octane predator tune: 359.35rwhp/362.29rwtq
    air/fuel: 12.2-12.5

    2. Trueflow, 91 octane predator tune: 369.25rwhp/372.78rwtq (9.9rwhp/10.49rwtq increase)
    air/fuel: 12.0-12.2


    3. C&L, 91 octane predator tune: 364.53rwhp/359.27rwtq (5.18rwhp/-3.02rwtq increase)
    air/fuel: 12.0-12.2

    4. Mopar, 91 octane predator tune: 364.25rwhp/359.52rwtq (4.9rwhp/-2.77rwtq increase)
    air/fuel: 12.0-12.2



    The trueflow made about 5rwhp and 13rwtq more than the C&L and the Mopar. We are definitely going to start carrying these intakes. Later today, we are going to write custom tunes for both the C&L and the Trueflow to maximize gains. We will post those results and we will offer those tunes for sale.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2008
  2. Quick

    Quick Mgmt. - I can't help you

    Messages:
    7,549
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    I think the trueflow sounds better.
     
  3. 8yourM5

    8yourM5 Full Access Member

    Messages:
    2,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    I still think its ulgy