Does warmer temps change your A/F...It is now getting in the 60's and 70's here and with the wideband at WOT my A/F was 12.0 - 12.8 when temps were in the 30's-40's.Now in the warmer temps it is 11.5 - 12.0 .I did notice that from a dig 1st and 2nd will be around 12.0 - 12.2 but when I get in third it is mid 11's...Is it the temps or is the wideband not as accurate...I did a free air calibration and it never changed things..Thanks
your a/f should stay consistant no matter what gear you are in but I too have noticed at the end of 3rd just as you go into 4th it does richen up so looks normal and yes the air temp will play a role
Thanks for the info...I will run it about 40-50mph and put it in autostick makeing sure it is in 5th gear.. punch it..watching it drop to about 11.6 now...Guess I will have to lean it out a bit....Thank you for the help
If your A/F ratio is richening up with increased temps, look for knock retard. Your computer will richen the mixture if it experiences significant knock. Better chances of getting knock as ambient temps increase.
Jeff, I'm not trying to be a smart ass or spread mis-information. We spent HOURS on the dyno and the street with the wide-band O2 sensor in efforts to get the A/F correct on my Jeep. We had our A/F ratio right where we wanted it, but when we got significant knock retard, the computer would start dumping additional fuel and our A/F ratio would get much richer. When we decreased timing and the knock went away, the A/F ratio was back on the money again. If you have a better explanation of what's going on, I'd like to hear it. I can tell you with 100% certainty that it wasn't just timing being pulled alone. That wouldn't explain the dramatic shifts in A/F ratio during knock. My experience has shown that the computer has a richening protocol during knock. I have not been able to find the table in CMR, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There's plenty of torque management tables you can't touch with CMR either.
Lets just ask Dave at B&G if anyone knows its him, lets keep it civil guys and provoking comments to yourself.
What was the advance in those situations? With knock retard and without knock retard? If the advance was less when knock retarded is it possible you weren't burning the entire charge?
In my case, we were aiming for a 12.5:1 A/F ratio and trying to get around 22 degrees of timing. The computer would pull 2 degrees of timing (down to 20 degrees) and the A/F ratio would drop to 11.5:1. When we changed the timing to 20 degrees, we got 0 knock and the A/F ratio stay solid at 12.5:1. I can't explain why 20 degrees of timing with 0 knock would allow the A/F ratio to stay at 12.5:1, but 2 degrees of knock (dropping from 22 degrees down to 20 degrees) would richen up the A/F ratio to 11.5:1. It's not timing that's changing the A/F ratio because the timing advance was the same in both cases. If Blown7 or anyone brighter than me would like to explain why it's richening up the mixture when knock is present, I'm all ears.
Dave knows a lot more than me and he will correct us all, but I am pretty sure the PCM only pulls timing and doesn't throw in more fuel....